Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

I’m doing some traveling with my wife and daughter for Christmas this year visiting some family members that we don’t get to see that often. Part of this evening’s festivities was playing an ignominious little game that I will refer to only as “LCR”, a non-game “game” that possesses the exact same level of strategy and tactics as Candyland and Bingo (or, the i.e., none).

Although I felt like I was betraying my identity as a tabletop gamer in some way by participating, you make sacrifices for family. And even though LCR isn’t really a game, it was a fun diversion that managed to bridge the gap between young an old and be something that family members spanning four generations could participate in and enjoy together. And in this case, it probably did it better than any board game could.


Oh yeah, my mom ended up winning the pot and decided to split it up equally between her four grandkids. 🙂


Breath of the Wild-Inspired World Map

We’ve been playing Breath of the Wild as a family lately, and constantly referring to he map while exploring this huge game has inspired my six year old to create a map of her own, “Crystalworld.” She points out that the orange and green land masses have share a similar design, a concept inspired by the “Dueling Peaks” mountains in Breath of the Wild. We’ll have to wait and see if further development of the history, places, and people that make up this world will be forthcoming.


My copy of Clank! arrived today


In between dinner and bedtime (our daughter’s, not ours), we sleeved and prepped the game as a family, and my wife and I got in a few rounds of play, with the girl spectating off to the side. Our first impressions of this game are good. It’s always a plus when I find a new game that my wife genuinely enjoys. We would’ve played more, but my daughter protested the idea of missing out on “discovering the game together as a family” (her words) so much that I promised her we’d wait until tomorrow morning so that we could all play it together.

Candyland: Advance


Hey, is that —

Before you ask: Yes, that is a picture of Candyland featured prominently at the top of this post.

What?!? But I thought this was a serious gaming blog! Candlyand isn’t even a real game!

Both are true statements. Here is the cipher that resolves the paradox: I am the father of a five-year old. Admittedly, I was blindsided when she chose Candyland for this evening’s pre-bedtime game, but as my wife pointed out, it would be an opportunity to try out the new rules that I had wanted to use since the day she was born.

So tonight, I present to you the rules for Candyland: Advance (or “Advanced Candyland” or “Candyland for Big Girls and Boys”  or whatever you want to call it):

  1. Setup the game as normal, except:
    • Remove the “Queen Frostine” picture card from the deck. (This card, already quite powerful, pretty much breaks this version of the game if it’s included. And yes, I realize that I’m actually expressing concern about not wanting to have broken rules in Candyland.)
    • Deal each player one random card.
  2.  On your turn, you may take one of the following actions:
    • Draw a card
    • Play a card
  3. Players are limited to a maximum of five cards in their hand; if they begin their turn with five cards, they must play one.
  4. Playing a card that would result in moving to a space that is already occupied advances you to the next open space of that color.

Aside from these changes, the game plays as normal. Simple as they are, these tweaks completely transform Candyland, turning it into an actual game since you now have to make decisions, even adding a minor amount of strategy.

A couple of observations from tonight’s game:

  • Implementing the rule about skipping a space that’s already occupied by another player not only alleviates the frustration of trying to cram multiple playing pieces onto a single space, but combining it  with the rule about being able to have multiple cards in your hand creates a layer of tactical decision-making.
  • On similar note, the cards that advance you to a picture card space are still powerful, but if you draw one after you’ve advanced past that space, they end up clogging your hand instead, effectively reducing the maximum number of cards you can hold.

These rules provide a way to fill the gap for kids who are ready for something more than simple children’s games but for whom gateway games may still be too much.

Oh , and I realize that these rules are pretty much a direct ripoff of Ticket to Ride, but like they say, if you’re gonna steal, steal from the best, right?

Starting 2017 Right!

New year, new games, right?

We’ve gotten in a few games of Mechs vs. Minions during the past week or so. Much has been said about this game, particularly the insanely good production values for the price… and it’s all true. The gameplay is also a real blast as well (er, no pun intended). The core mechanics of the game are pretty simple and intuitive, and the missions layer on additional rules as you go, creating a gentle learning curve.


Playing a learning game with my resident gamer-in-training. She’s at the point now where she’s able to read a good amount of  the card text by herself.

We haven’t gotten through all of the missions yet, but maybe we’ll make that one of our resolutions for 2017. Gameplay videos coming soon(ish)!

Mario-thon 2016

My daughter and I have been dabbling with Mario games on the Wii U for the past few weeks. We started with New Super Mario Bros. but recently switched over to New Super Mario 3D World, which she says is her favorite. I suspect that her preference is not so much due to the gameplay, but because of the cat suit powerup and the ability to play as Princess Peach.

We had our first ever Mario-thon today, consisting of playing “Kitty Mario” (her name for Super Mario 3D World, which I now regret correcting her on) all day. In reality, it was really four game sessions of about 30-45 minutes each, interspersed with meals, yardwork, and other activities. What made this event even more special is that although I picked  this game up the day it was released back in 2013 with the intent of playing it with my wife’s family over Thanksgiving, I’ve barely touched it since then. This means that almost all of the game is still new to me, so we’re playing through it together for the first time.


When Roll-and-Move is Superfluous

Ah, the roll-and-move mechanic. Is there anything more ubiquitous in classic American boardgames, anything that more clearly defines a boardgame as such? It’s such a staple that entire children’s games have been constructed around this simple mechanic – for example, both Chutes and Ladders and Trouble are built from it, with one or two twists added on top.

Perhaps no other mechanic so directly translates an action taken by a player into a clear effect in the game. You roll the dice (or flick the spinner, as the case may be), and move your plastic avatar an equal number of spaces. It’s a concept that is so concrete and simple that even very young children can grasp it. It is well-placed in certain games, but it has been overused to the point where its inclusion in some cases is illogical or lazy. I can practically hear the conversation in the design meetings:

GAME DESIGNER: This is a trivia game where players have to correctly answer questions in a variety of categories ranging from history to pop culture, to sports. Trivia games have a broad appeal across many demographics, but the real strength of this game is its potential as a cash cow; we can release innumerable other versions with questions dealing exclusively with TV shows, movie franchises, and boy bands.

WELL-INTENTIONED, YET CLUELESS CEO: I like it! I think we should have the track that the pawns move through be round, and should players roll one or two dice to see how far they move on their turn? Also, we should have matching colors for the pawns and pie wedges that the players have to collect. Chromatic synergy will really draw people in!



Off the top of my head, I can think of three classic games where roll-and-move is a poor or unnecessary inclusion, and I’m certain that many more exist. However, rather than just being an exercise in bagging on old-school boardgames, I’ll suggest alternative mechanics that can help improve them.

A casual stroll through Murder Mansion

The inclusion of roll-and-move in Clue is somewhat forgivable, as the pawns and the board represent the characters moving through the various rooms of the mansion. But it does beg the question of why the characters’ movement speeds can vary so wildly from one moment to the next. Does Miss Scarlet break a heel and have to take a moment to remove her shoes? Does Col. Mustard have a trick knee that sometimes acts up? More importantly though, it mainly serves as a tacked-on mechanic that does nothing to enhance the core gameplay: putting together clues and using logic and deductive reasoning to solve the mystery (or alternatively, making false accusations to lead the other players astray).

The Solution: One time during my childhood, my father adroitly demonstrated how much better this game is without using dice for movement and simply allowing players to move from the room they’re currently in to an adjacent room on their turn. You can’t go directly from a room on one side of the board to a room on the opposite side (unless they’re connected by a tunnel), but getting there by moving from one room to the next using this method takes no more time, and probably less on average, than using dice to get there. Plus, since you spend every turn in a room, you get to make an accusation on each of your turns – that is, actually playing the game. Most people don’t mind graciously waiting for their turn to come around while the other players take theirs, but missing out on one or more turns because you didn’t roll high enough to get to the next room is just frustrating.

The questionable triviality of roll-and-move

Roll-and-move in Triivial Pursuit entirely superfluous. Trivia is fun. Roll-and-move can be fun, but not when it’s so utterly and completely disassociated with everything else in the game. The core of Trivial Pursuit is answering trivia questions. What’s the first thing that comes into your mind when you hear the words “trivial pursuit?” At what point does rolling a die to push a pawn around a board enter the picture?

It’s fine that the goal of the game is to correctly answer a question from six different categories. But, similar to Clue, it becomes exceedingly frustrating having to waste turns waiting for the correct number to come up on the die which will finally allow you to move to a space so that you can have a shot at answering a question from that one category you need.

The Solution: There are many ways to make this game better. Instead of it being a race, which is what is accomplished by the inclusion of the random movement element, make it a more traditional trivia game by scoring points for answering questions correctly. Or skip the points and have the goal remain getting a correct answer in each of the six categories. You can even roll the die to randomly choose the category. It will still be aggravating waiting for that last category that you need to come up on the die, but it will be less so than trying to get the exact number you need to land on a wedge space on the board.

Removing the movement aspect of the game makes it exclusively about answering trivia questions… but isn’t that the point of playing trivia-based games? Young kids enjoy counting spaces on the board and moving pawns around; anyone old enough to actually know the answers to the trivia questions will find this aspect of the game tedious.

A monopoly on randomness

Of my three examples, roll-and move is most justifiable in Monopoly, as there needs to be some randomizer to determine when players owe rent, and to whom. Unfortunately, while there are some strategies and tactics that can be employed, the gameplay leans too heavily on this mechanic, and too much of the game comes down to the fickle whim of the dice gods.

The solution: The fix here requires approaching the game through the lens of verisimilitude. Think about it: If the players are all wealthy real estate moguls, why are they staying at someone else’s hotel, and spending so much money that it potentially bankrupts them? Rather than representing the players, the tokens represent vacationers visiting Atlantic City* and looking for lodging.  Suddenly, using dice to randomly  move tokens around the board makes more sense, as it’s simulating tourists choosing to stay at in different locations.

Property would still be acquired the normal way, and trades could be made, but rather than players paying each other, rent money would just come from the bank (not really representing an actual bank in this case, but the collective wallets of the hotel guests). The winner would be the first player to accumulate a certain amount of money. This would preserve existing strategies (for example, the statistical chance that someone lands on a given property), but it would also remove the player elimination aspect of the game. Nothing’s worse than going bankrupt in the first hour of Monopoly and having to sit around waiting for the game to finish. The rules as written say that normally the game ends as soon as one player is eliminated, and the winner is the person with the most money and property, but every game that I ever played always went down to the last man standing. There are some minor tweaks to gameplay that would have to be made in order for it to all work, but I think this would be a refreshing new twist on a classic game.


Roll-and-move is a valid mechanic that has its place, another tool in the box of game design. Like any other mechanic, there is nothing inherent about it that will make a game more or less enjoyable; how enjoyable a game is depends on a number of factors; choosing the correct mechanics and skillfully implementing them in a way that conveys the experience that the designer is trying to achieve is just one of these factors.


*Or Middle Earth. Or Springfield. Or the Death Star. Seriously, the verisimilitude only holds up if you play the original game and not one of the other entries on the interminable list of re-skins.



I mentioned it in passing earlier, and it seems somehow remiss to not discuss the game that probably best epitomizes the roll-and-move mechanic, distilled down to almost pure form: Trouble. Honestly, when I first started writing this essay, it hadn’t even crossed my mind to write about this game, much less come up with a solution to improve it. One reason it didn’t occur to me to include it is that Trouble doesn’t merely include this mechanic, it is this mechanic; I can’t really label something as being superfluous when removing it would mean gutting about 90% of the gameplay.

My daughter received a copy of Trouble this past Christmas. I was somewhat dreading the inevitable request to play – not because I don’t love sharing all facets of tabletop gaming with her, but because my now decades-old memories of my last time playing it are of sitting with my sister and cousins in a room in my grandparents’ house, not really having anything else to do, but still getting bored waiting for the coveted “6” to come up so we could get on with things. Furthermore, at five years old, she already has some experience playing games that have significantly more depth (King of Tokyo and Formula D, for example), and playing Trouble at this point seemed akin to getting stomped on by an opponent’s pawn and being sent back to start. However, one afternoon shortly after New Year’s, it occurred to me that giving it a try might make for a nice diversion and be a quick and easy way to get in some family time, so I actually ended up asking to play.

Unbeknownst to me, my daughter had been given an updated version of the game which includes several new additions that leave the simplicity intact but also make it a much faster-paced, tactical game (yes, I did just use the word “tactical” to describe Trouble). There are new spaces which give the player an extra die roll (or pop, in this case) and warp spaces which allow a pawn to skip half the length of the track. Perhaps the best new rule is that rolling a one results in not only that player immediately ending their turn, but, in a brilliant example of game design, allows each of the other players to move one of their own pawns from the start position onto the track. In the past, the worst part of Trouble was having only a 1 in 6 chance on your turn of being able to move a piece from its starting position and getting it into play. Now there’s a 1 in 3 chance that somebody will get to put a piece into play on a given roll.

The end result is a much more crowded board – which means that there are more situations that occur in which decisions have to be made – and much more frenetic gameplay; it’s almost like playing an entirely new game. This is not to say that hardcore gamers will want to pick up a copy to bring to their next game night, but it is a game that hardcore gamers who are parents can enjoy with young children and which can potentially be a stepping-stone to becoming serious gamers themselves. A few simple tweaks revitalized this classic, and I couldn’t have thought of any better improvements myself.